The Law Blog

Proving the conspiracy.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/Story?id=6443988&page=1

I was just thinking about the ABC.com article that came out recently asking what is behind the Internet Conspiracy Empires? I think it’s a good question, and so I thought I would take you back through some of the conspiracies that we have looked at over the last couple of years. They will not all be conspiracies, but they will help to show why I have drawn my conclusion about our current conspiracy, and what is behind Gang Stalking.

The Snitching System.

http://www.thejusticeproject.org/wp-content/uploads/snitchsystembooklet1.pdf

[quote]“The history of the snitch is long and inglorious, dating to the common law. In old England, snitches were ubiquitous.Their motives, then as now, were unholy. In the 18th Century, Parliament prescribed monetary rewards—blood money—for snitches, who were turned back onto the streets where they were, in the words of one contemporary commentator,“the contempt and terror of society.”

“The system produced a cycle of betrayal in which each snitch knew he might find himself soon in the dock confronted by another snitch.”

“If all cases ended so poetically, perhaps informant dependent prosecutions would be more humorous than objectionable. In real life, however, O. Henry endings are rare.”

“The snitch system probably arrived in the New World with the Pilgrims.The first documented wrongful conviction case in the United States involved a snitch.The case arose in Manchester, Vermont, in 1819. Brothers Jesse and Stephen Boorn were suspected of killing their brother-in-law, Russell Colvin. Jesse was put into a cell with a forger, Silas Merrill, who would testify that Jesse confessed. Merrill was rewarded with freedom.
The Boorn brothers were convicted and sentenced to death but saved from the gallows when Colvin turned up alive in New Jersey.”[/quote]

With the advent of modern day society can we assume that the Snitching System became obsolete, or would it be better to rightfully conclude that it was and still is an integral part of society and as relevant today as it was yesterday? It is also just as much a concern for this time period as it has been in others?

The Secret Persuaders

During WWII before America agreed to join the war, the United Kingdom set up a secret agency inside of America, designed to convince the entire nation it was a good idea to join the war. This was back in 1940 and this agency had almost 3000 operatives. They sent out false media stories, via newspapers and other mediums they had set up within America. To the individuals that were anti-war they had a game that they played called VIK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/aug/19/military.secondworldwar

[quote]BSC invented a game called “Vik“, described as “a fascinating new pastime for lovers of democracy”. Printed booklets described up to 500 ways of harassing and annoying Nazi sympathisers. Players of Vik were encouraged to ring up their targets at all hours of the night and hang up. Dead rats could be put in water tanks, air could be let out of the subject’s car tyres, anonymous deliveries could be made to his house and so on. In the summer of 1941, BSC sent a sham Hungarian astrologer to the US called Louis de Wohl. At a press conference De Wohl said he had been studying Hitler’s astrological chart and could see nothing but disaster ahead for the German dictator. De Wohl became a minor celebrity and went on tour through the US, issuing similar dire prognostications about Hitler and his allies. De Wohl’s wholly bogus predictions were widely published.[/quote]

I have never been able to locate the booklet with the 500 ways of harassing those that were anti-war, but I am sure some of those methods survived to this time period.

Here are some more amazing details about this agency that was set up by a foreign body on U.S. soil for the sole purpose of manipulating the population intogoing to war. This would have continued, but conveniently ended when the Japanese hit pearl harbour, what a unique coincidence.

[quote]BSC was set up by a Canadian entrepreneur called William Stephenson, working on behalf of the British Secret Intelligence Services (SIS). An office was opened in the Rockefeller Centre in Manhattan with the discreet compliance of Roosevelt and J Edgar Hoover of the FBI. But nobody on the American side of the fence knew what BSC’s full agenda was nor, indeed, what would be the massive scale of its operations. What eventually occurred as 1940 became 1941 was that BSC became a huge secret agency of nationwide news manipulation and black propaganda. Pro-British and anti-German stories were planted in American newspapers and broadcast on American radio stations, and simultaneously a campaign of harassment and denigration was set in motion against those organisations perceived to be pro-Nazi or virulently isolationist (such as the notoriously anti-British America First Committee – it had more than a million paid-up members).
Stephenson called his methods “political warfare”, but the remarkable fact about BSC was that no one had ever tried to achieve such a level of “spin”, as we would call it today, on such a vast and pervasive scale in another country. The aim was to change the minds of an entire population: to make the people of America think that joining the war in Europe was a “good thing” and thereby free Roosevelt to act without fear of censure from Congress or at the polls in an election.

BSC’s media reach was extensive: it included such eminent American columnists as Walter Winchell and Drew Pearson, and influenced coverage in newspapers such as the Herald Tribune, the New York Post and the Baltimore Sun. BSC effectively ran its own radio station, WRUL, and a press agency, the Overseas News Agency (ONA), feeding stories to the media as they required from foreign datelines to disguise their provenance. WRUL would broadcast a story from ONA and it thus became a US “source” suitable for further dissemination, even though it had arrived there via BSC agents. It would then be legitimately picked up by other radio stations and newspapers, and relayed to listeners and readers as fact. The story would spread exponentially and nobody suspected this was all emanating from three floors of the Rockefeller Centre. BSC took enormous pains to ensure its propaganda was circulated and consumed as bona fide news reporting. To this degree its operations were 100% successful: they were never rumbled. [/quote]

That is an amazing conspiracy that very few knew anything about. Are branches of this program still operational in some capacity on foreign soil today? It’s hard to say.

Operation Gladio

An actual operation that hired agents and had them in keeping in such a time as when they were needed. This is another jewel that came to light while doing research into Gang Stalking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

[quote]Emblem of NATO’s “stay-behind” paramilitary organizations.After World War II, the UK and the US decided to create “stay-behind” paramilitary organizations, with the official aim of countering a possible Soviet invasion through sabotage and guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines. Arms caches were hidden, escape routes prepared, and loyal members recruited: i.e. mainly hardline anticommunists, including many ex-Nazis or former fascists, whether in Italy or in other European countries. In Germany, for example, Gladio had as a central focus the Gehlen Org — also involved in ODESSA “ratlines” — named after Reinhard Gehlen who would become West Germany’s first head of intelligence, while the predominantly Italian P2 masonic lodge was composed of many members of the neofascist Italian Social Movement (MSI), including Licio Gelli. Its clandestine “cells” were to stay behind (hence the name) in enemy controlled territory and to act as resistance movements, conducting sabotage, guerrilla warfare and assassinations.

However, Italian Gladio was more far reaching. “A briefing minute of June 1, 1959, reveals Gladio was built around ‘internal subversion’. It was to play ‘a determining role… not only on the general policy level of warfare, but also in the politics of emergency’. In the 1970s, with communist electoral support growing and other leftists looking menacing, the establishment turned to the ‘Strategy of Tension’ … with Gladio eager to be involved.”[
[/quote]

A secret paramilitary army that exists in many European countries and has since the end of WWII, set up by the U.S. and the U.K.? Kept secret all the way up to 1990 when the Italian wing was exposed, and then the other branches were exposed as well. This secret army might have remained secret to this day, except for the extreme involvement of the Italian wing in local policy.

[quote]“Coordinated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), {the secret armies} were run by the European military secret services in close cooperation with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the British foreign secret service Secret Intelligence Service (SIS, also MI6). Trained together with US Green Berets and British Special Air Service (SAS), these clandestine NATO soldiers, armed with underground arms-caches, prepared against a potential Soviet invasion and occupation of Western Europe, as well as the coming to power of communist parties. The clandestine international network covered the European NATO membership, including Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxemburg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey, as well as the neutral European countries of Austria, Finland, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland.

‘The existence of these clandestine NATO armies remained a closely guarded secret throughout the Cold War until 1990, when the first branch of the international network was discovered in Italy. It was code-named Gladio, the Latin word for a short double-edged sword [gladius]. While the press said the NATO secret armies were ‘the best-kept, and most damaging, political-military secret since World War II’, the Italian government, amidst sharp public criticism, promised to close down the secret army. Italy insisted identical clandestine armies had also existed in all other countries of Western Europe. This allegation proved correct and subsequent research found that in Belgium, the secret NATO army was code-named SDRA8, in Denmark Absalon, in Germany TD BJD, in Greece LOK, in Luxemburg Stay-Behind, in the Netherlands I&O, in Norway ROC, in Portugal Aginter, in Switzerland P26, in Turkey Counter-Guerrilla, In Sweden AGAG (Aktions Gruppen Arla Gryning, and in Austria OWSGV. However, the code names of the secret armies in France, Finland and Spain remain unknown.
[/quote]

The promised that they would close down these secret armies. We however know that with other similar programs they are never shut down, they are just repackaged and start up again. That is one heck of a conspiracy. Secret armies in many European countries set up by the U.S. and the U.K.

Red Squads

Not so much a conspiracy, but a little known wing of the police that exists in many countries around the world. Set up for the sole purpose of destroying dissidence. During Cointelpro and the Canadian VIP program they worked closely with the government to neutralize dissidence.

http://www.amazon.com/Protectors-Privilege-Squads-Repression-America/dp/0520080351/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1229548302&sr=1-1

[quote] The cops love these free-wheeling, elite units. They were ostensibly created to combat terrorism, but have been used mostly to infiltrate and suppress liberal and radical political organizations and civil rights groups. They lift their members out of the routine of police work into something of a James Bond life. As Frank Donner points out in this excellently researched, thoughtful and well-detailed study of police spying, their excesses have been many. But Donner, who directed the American Civil Liberties Project on Political Surveillance, concludes with the chilling thought that the Red squads will be around long after there are any Reds.[/quote]

These groups go back over a hundred years, as each new wave of immigrant population introduced themselves Red Squads were there, using informants to infiltrate, get information and help to disrupt these groups, movements, and unions. With other infiltration programs the idea is to try to get the corportion of members of the infiltrated groups, by asking some of them to become informants. Once you are an informant for the system, you are always considered an informant for the system.

[quote]Worse yet, the information, and misinformation, gathered by these sleuths is fed into the growing number of intelligence networks maintained by federal, state and local law-enforcement organizations. In the computer age, if you attend a left-wing meeting in Echo Park, your name is likely to be spread as far as New York.
As Donner points out, the squads are not a recent invention. One of his most important contributions is tracing the history of the Red squads, showing how deeply rooted they are in American political, social and economic life….

…That set the pattern for the Red squads, a pattern that continues today. Whatever the city, said Donner, the goal and tactics are much the same: “police behavior motivated or influenced in whole or in part by hostility to protest, dissent and related activities perceived as a threat to the status quo.”
[/quote]

Elite branches of the police designed to squash dissident and protect against perceived threats to the status quo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_squad

[quote]In New York, former City Police Commissioner Patrick Murphy traced their origin there to an “Italian Squad” formed in 1904 to monitor a group of Italian immigrants under suspicion[1]. However, it is their association with fighting communism which provides the basis for the name “Red Squad.” They became more commonplace in the 1930s, often conceived of as a countermeasure to Communist organizers who were charged with executing a policy of dual unionism – namely, building a revolutionary movement in parallel with membership in above-ground labor organizations. Similar units were established in Canada in this period, although only the Toronto police used the name.

In the late 1960s, as the protests against Vietnam and the general domestic upheaval intensified, the Red Squads augmented their focus, to include dissidents largely outside the labor movement, including therein not just war resisters, but protest movements of all political stripes, including Neonazis, Native American movements, the women’s movement, environmentalists, the civil rights movement, and others. The methods employed ranged from simple surveillance to isolated incidents of assassination. Anti-activist police operations were expanded under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, particularly in concert with, and within the cadre of the FBI’s COINTELPRO surveillance program, but also including domestic spying by the CIA.
[/quote]

This very rarely discussed unit of the police apparently were in and still are in existence in many cities, some going by different names, but the same concept applies, squash dissidence.

Alexandra Natapoff

http://www.aclu.org/images/asset_upload_file744_30623.pdf

[quote]
The use of criminal informants in the U.S. justice system has become a flourishing socio-legal institution. Every year, tens of thousands of criminal suspects, many of them drug offenders concentrated in inner-city neighborhoods, informally negotiate away liability in exchange for promised cooperation, while law enforcement at the local, state and federal levels rely on ever greater numbers of criminal actors in making basic decisions about investigations and prosecutions. While this marriage of convenience is fraught with peril, it is nearly devoid of judicial or public scrutiny as to the propriety, fairness, or utility of the deals being struck. At the same time, it is a quintessential expression of some of the most contentious characteristics of the modern criminal system: law enforcement discretion, secrecy, and the increasing informality of the adjudication process.
The informant institution is also an under-appreciated social force in low-income, high-crime, urban communities in which a high percentage of residents – as many as fifty percent of African American males in some cities – are in contact with the criminal justice system and therefore potentially under pressure to snitch. By relying heavily on snitching, particularly in drug-related cases, law enforcement officials create large numbers of informants who remain at large in the community, engaging in criminal activities while under pressure to provide information about others. These snitches are a communal liability: they increase crime and threaten social organization, interpersonal relationships, and socio-legal norms in their home communities, even as they are tolerated or under-punished by law enforcement because they are useful.

The Article also hypothesizes the harms imposed by the informant institution on socially disadvantaged, high-crime communities in which snitching is common. These harms may include increased crime, the erosion of trust in interpersonal, familial and community relationships and other psychological damage created by pervasive informing, the communal loss of faith in the state, and the undermining of law-abiding norms flowing from law enforcement’s rewarding of and complicity in snitch wrongdoing.

[/quote]

Many people see this article and assume it’s an inner city problem, but it’s not. This is a societal problem. These informant programs are not just going after African American males, they are going after the females, and they are going after other communities. They started in these communities, and these communities currently have higher ratios of Informants, but then it branches out.

Imagine a society where over 50% of your community is a potential snitch? Imagine what that does to the heart and soul of a society? Some people don’t have to imagine because they have already been through something very similar.

[quote]

http://www.november.org/razorwire/2005-02/art/RazorWire-V8N3a.pdf

“As summer travel ebbed, I dove into the study of
the informant system, as pertains to those whom the police arrest, then pressure to go back into their
places of home and work and set others up for arrest.”

How many informants do we have in communities? We can’t measure it because of this secret system, but experts have some guesses.

“Because researchers know what is behind the search warrants granted, they know that almost 98% of the time the police don’t have any goods on anyone, just a confidential informant. A lot of informing is going on, and it’s escalating.”

“So they squeeze these people into rolling on their mother. Our family involved my brother’s girlfriend; it was her brother who turned her in, and so we went through this ourselves. And it is hard to try to explain to people this part — people do 20, 30 years and they get through it. Somehow, I don’t know how.
I’ve never been to prison, but they get through
it, and what dogs them all of the time is this —
how could my sister do that to me? How could my friend do this to me? That stays with them.
That psychological damage never goes away.

And it spreads to everyone in the family, just like anything traumatic does, and you get a bunch of sick people.”

When I grew up, the Russians were doing it a lot, the informant system throughout all the communities. A person could be hauled off and interrogated and taken off to the ice fields. It terrified me, those Russian people. We studied these communities in
Russia after that period because there was a lot of
mental illness. Our country went over there to help them with all their crazy people. And do you know what our country found out? Our scientists and
doctors went over there and came back and said, “It was all those informants. It made them crazy to live
among people, and nobody knew who was going to rip them off, or who needed to ‘get in good,’ or some favor. And so turn someone in, and that person gets hauled off to Siberia. It made people crazy. <b>Well, that’s what is happening in our communities now.”</b>
[/quote]

The new face of snitching might surprise you. As mentioned they started in ethnic communities, but they have branched out so much further then this.

http://www.mapinc.org/images/Hoffman.jpg

Meet Rachel Hoffman she was a 23-year-old Florida State psychology graduate, she is also the face of snitching. Rachel earlier this year agreed to become an Informant to lower her sentence for a drug conviction. She was killed while making a drug purchase for the police to help reduce her drug sentence. Informants come from a variety of social and economical backgrounds and once caught up in the system, many will do anything to escape prison sentences normally offered for much more severe crimes.

http://november.org/stayinfo/breaking08/FinalNight.html

[quote]Immediately after Tallahassee police raided her apartment April 17, Hoffman went to her boyfriend’s house and told him about the deal she’d cut. Over the next three weeks, she would tell him and Liza all about her work as a confidential informant.

“They wanted her to turn in her friends, and she wouldn’t do that,” said Liza, a 24-year-old FSU graduate student. “She said she wanted to get some grimy people off the street. She wanted to get bad guys.”

At first she agreed to give up a guy she knew who dealt drugs and sometimes bought pot from her, her friends said. But after one controlled call from the police station, she confessed to him she was working for the police and asked him to help her find someone else to turn in.[/quote]

She was killed during a sting that went wrong. She was an inexperienced 23 year old, who didn’t want to go to jail, didn’t want her parents to find out, and thought this would be a cool way to work off her sentence. She paid the ultimate price for it. This story is not that uncommon in today’s modern society, but many of us, like myself, were previously unaware of the extent to which citizen informants are being used in society.

She should no more have been turned into an Informant than many of these young urban men and woman, who also don’t want to spend years in jail, vs living outside for minor drug possessions, these people exchange their freedoms for a type of slavery and servitude to the system that is unimaginable. These situations are becoming too common, and they are contributing to the detriment and moral fiber of our societies.

Fusion Centers and TLO

The informant system is not just using paid informants. They are also using an army of volunteer Informants. The Citizen Informants who are parts of various community programs, or who were inducted via their place of employment.

http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/privacy/fusion_update_20080729.pdf

The ACLU has released a report on Fusion Centers. 800,000 operatives will be dispersed throughout every American city and town. Set to report on even the most common everyday behaviors which will go into state, local and regional, linked data bases.

This number of 800,000 is outside of other Informant programs that are already in place within America. Informants working via Citizen Corps, and other sub programs.

There are informant programs for local businesses, informant programs for truckers, boats, and so many others.

http://blog.t1production.com/utility-workers-hired-as-stasi-informants-in-colorado-california-arizona

T.I.P.S. officially died, but lived on in many other forms.

Spying101

The Canadian Government spying on it’s own citizens? Canada that friendly and peaceful nation? The very one.

http://www.spying101.com/

http://www.gangstalkingunited.com/forum/books/spying-101/

[quote]If you attended a Canadian university in the past eighty years, it’s possible that, unbeknownst to you, Canadian security agents were surveying you, your fellow students, and your professors for ‘subversive’ tendencies and behaviour. Since the end of the First World War, members of the RCMP have infiltrated the campuses of Canada’s universities and colleges to spy, meet informants, gather information, and on occasion, to attend classes. [/quote]

[quote]RCMP spies kept secret files on hundreds of Canadian Politicians and bureaucrats at all three levels of government as part of a project known as the “VIP program,”[/quote]

[quote]The book, a thorough examination of RCMP surveillance of the academic world, also discusses the Mounties’ efforts to keep tabs on other
elements of society, including government, the media and women’s groups.

The RCMP created security files on 800,000 Canadians, and it has long been known the force took an active interest in politicians and public
servantswith links to Communist organizations or other pursuits deemed subversive.[/quote]

Talk about conspiracy. The Canadian government for over 80 years spied on it’s citizens and opened files on many of it’s citizens just because they attended a university or college? If the Canadian government was willing to do this, what about other nations?

This program after 80 years of operation within Canadian Universities and Colleges, when exposed supposedly formally ended. That is the official story that the public is suppose to believe.

These spying programs were not content to just watch the universities, the research shows that they branched out into the community, because after graduating, these people might still have subversive ideas.

Within the last 10 years since the program supposedly ended, it’s hard to imagine how many new files might have been opened on unsuspecting students.

Stasis- What happened to these people who were former spies for the East German state?

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,540771,00.html

[quote]More East Germans were spying on their neighbors, colleagues, family and friends when the Berlin Wall fell than had previously been thought. According to a report published Monday, 189,000 people were informers for the Stasi — the former Communist secret police — when East Germany collapsed in 1989 — 15,000 more than previous studies had suggested.[/quote]

The C.I.A. were handed the list of these names after the Berlin Wall fell. How many went to other countries and were asked to continue with their domestic spying is unclear.

The above scenarios are just a few of the conspiracies, intrigues, and surprising information I have come across when researching Gang Stalking.

what I am seeing is a continual and consistent pattern of something that is systemic, with many absorption points. This means that citizens are being incorporated into these programs through many different venues, some via their families. Other through educational institutions, others via their places of employment, other through religious institutions, etc.

I am also seeing a link to some people that are being mobbed and bullied out of this system. I am also seeing the same patterns of collusion that has been reported elsewhere, by others.

http://www.bullyonline.org/action/obstruct.htm

http://www.targetedindividuals.com/System.html

That’s part of the conspiracy that I am seeing, and this conspiracy has been ongoing within society for some time now. Many communities have been affected by this and some are very aware of the level of snitching and informing that is ongoing in society, paid and unpaid. Others have had very limited or no exposure to these concepts, and therefore are not aware of what is ongoing in society.

gangstalking
http://www.articlesbase.com/news-and-society-articles/conspiracies-695384.html

2003 – Excerpt from the writings of a black author:

Disappearance of the Caucasian Race – The Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Directive 15, designates racial and ethnic categories used in the US

Census and in other innumerable public and private research projects.

When the term 8 percenters is used in this article, it refers to the disappearance of the European (Scandinavian/Nordic) White Caucasian Race. You can do a

quick examination for yourself. Go to the Population Reference Bureau Website for 2003 and add the figures together. If you take the numbers given for Europe

and North America and divide them by the numbers given for Africa, Asia, South America and Oceania you can calculate the percentages. At the present time

(2003) Whites amount to about 20 percent. By 2050 the percentage will drop to between 5 – 8%. Between 92-95% of the world’s population will be non-White.

Today,  the following countries show a serious population decline: Italy, Spain, Germany, France, Belgium, Portugal, Greece, Croatia, Ukraine, Russia,

Slovakia, Romania, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, and Bulgaria with more on the way. Germans – like the Italians, Russian, Spanish and Greeks – are also an

endangered species. And what is the common bond?

They are all ‘white’ nations.

If you are a woman, there is something I wish to call to your attention. The human reace cannot survive without replacing those who die. The exact average

number of replacements that are necessary for survival is 2.1 offspring per healthy adult female. There are no exceptions. Where babies are the result of

copulation between male and female, each female must produce on average, 2.1 offspring for survival. Since this is fact, when we say that a woman has the

right to choose whether or not to have children, we are also saying she has the right to determine the future of mankind.

Did we mean to say that?

When men and women were created, they were created as a matched set. Like a nut and bolt, together they served a purpose. The purpose – the only purpose –

was the propagation of the species. Were it not for that, one gender would have been sufficient.

FACT:

“Never before in history has such a progressive, accomplished race as the Caucasians, been so willing to destroy itself.”

I am aware that many women today object to the thought that there is a greater power than themselves so let me take a moment to put this on a personal level.

If you are a family man or woman, and you do have children, are there not rules of behavior for your family? Can your 14 year old stay out til 4:00 AM solely

because he or she wants to? No? Why not?

The answer is obvious. Your family like any group has rules; it has responsibilities and obligations to go along with benefits. That’s necessary both for

prosperity and for survival. In that regard, your family is a microcosm of society.

So what if your 19 year-old son refused to do the one thing that he had to do for the family’s survival? Whatever that might be. And what if there was no one

else who could do it but him? Would you just shrug it off and let him stay in your home, under your protection,  even as he threatened your family’s

survival? What if he said maybe the kid next door will come over and fulfill this vital function instead of him? Would you accept that?

My guess is you wouldn’t. If your son placed you and your family’s survival in jeopardy, and he wouldn’t change his conduct, eventually you would have to ask

him to leave. There would be little choice.

In tribal days long gone, any member of a tribe who didn’t perform services for the good of that tribe, was evicted.  Existence as part of a group has to be

a quid pro quo arrangement.

There are essential responsibilities and obligations that must be fulfilled by a group’s members if the group – in this case society – is to survive. Having

the requisite number of babies is one of those essential responsibilities and obligations. It is essential, not voluntary. There is simply no substitute for

babies. We need 2.1 babies per women or we perish and it’s just that simple.

Women today have been taught that abortion is an inalienable ‘right’. To that, I would say: nonsense. Abortions affect the ability of a society to survive so

abortion is everybody’s business.

In this coutry, abortions have only been legal since 1973 – a period of about 35 years. It was illegal, and not a ‘right’ at all, for the first 200 years of

our country’s existence. So if it’s a ‘right’ today, it was a ‘wrong’ yesterday. My point here is that ‘rights’ come and go according to society’s needs.

They are not assigned by some higher power.

In this country, like all others, there are a hundred thousand laws that in some way restrict or even deny us certain of what we might think of as our

‘rights’. That all part of being in a society. Rights are defined for the good of that society and must be observed by every member thereof.  But as the

needs of the society change, so do “rights’. Therefore, when you speak of the ‘right to choose’, keep in mind that “right” is nothing more than what the

current law says it is. And that can change for the good of the society.

Today, many women have adopted a “let the women who want kids, have them” philosophy Of course they, much like your son, do want to continue to live at home

(in our society) availing themselves of the family’s (society’s) goods and services and protection but they just don’t want to meet their own obligation, to

wit: having the children we need to survive.

Well, it doesn’t work that way. This is a totally egocentric position and it completely ignores the absolute needs of society and if they don’t care, they

cannot be allowed to continue within the society they are destroying. That would be societal suicide. .

Does this sound like your son?

In November of 2007, an adult European female took it upon herself to proclaim to the world that she had undergone sterilization to fight overpopulation.

“Having children,” she declared with grave pomposity, “is selfish”.

The woman, if she is a Caucasian which I suspect she is, couldn’t be more wrong.

In that part of the world where overpopulation is indeed a problem, they won’t pay the slightest attention to her. In that part of the world that will pay

attention,. the problem isn’t too many babies, it’s too few.

If this woman is Caucasian, rather than sterilization, she would have been better served by getting pregnant.

Today’s birth rate for Caucasian woman in most of the Western world is way below the sustaining rate of 2.1 per healthy adult woman. Therefore, they are

effectively terminating their entire race. After 5,000 years women like this one, will have destroyed it.

While this is true of Caucasian women, it is not so true of other women. For example, the birth rate in Muslim countries is way over 3.0 per woman; hence,

Muslim populations are expanding and will not disappear. It’s the same with African and South American Hispanics (mix of White, Black and Indian), these

population groups also have sustainable birth rates and therefore are not in danger of imminent extinction. Today, only Caucasians are in danger of

extinction, with one major exception: Japan: Japan too is dying. Its birth rate is so low; they no longer have the children they need to care for their

elderly so they are actually turning to robots to take care of the aged. How sad is that? Because of what this woman, and others like her, has done, Muslims

are moving into formerly Caucasian countries all over Western Europe. They are exercising more and more power and growing stronger even as the indigenous

white populations are slowly aging and becoming weaker. It’s just a matter of time until the Caucasians are replaced as the power in Western Europe and I

don’t imagine it will be a peaceful transition.

The fact is this may eventually become a living hell for those who are giving up power. Islam is an intolerant religion when it comes to Infidels and all

those white people who are left will be seen as Christian Infidels.

There will come a time when they will curse the women who so proudly carried those “CHOICE” banners. 

So, I guess the only question now is, will the world be better or worse off for this woman’s decision to end the Caucasian race – a race that has contributed

so much to the development of civilization and human rights?

Well, that depends on your point of view. (And maybe on your color.)

Looking around, it seems clear to me that most of the non-Caucasian world has less of the things that we Caucasians cherish: less personal prosperity, less

personal freedom, less of the good things in life. Some may not like hearing that but look around and see where you want to go if you leave your homeland in

America or in Western Europe or Australia or Canada. Where do you want to go to live? In truth, you won’t find many places like our homeland.

But it doesn’t matter any more. The fat is in the fire and western civilization is on the way out thanks to the women who have simply been too busy doing

important things to have babies.

It is too late to turn the demographic clock back now. We might be able to slow it up a little but we can no longer reverse it.

We have reached the point of no-return.

Caucasian women with their ‘right to choose’ will have ‘chosen’ to converted those 43 formerly Western European Caucasian nations (birthplace to so many of

our ancestors) to Muslim nations perhaps to the horror of the few remaining Christians. This upcoming population change has been confirmed by the UN Center

on Population Control and by the US Census Bureau and is well underway already.

Sadly, our Caucasian women have made one too many bad choices. They came to believe that what they were doing out in the world was more important than having

babies when in truth, nothing else a woman – any healthy woman – does, is one tenth as important as having babies. We can exist without her production in the

workforce, we cannot exist without her babies in life.

Now some of you undoubtedly don’t like hearing this but unfortunately it’s still true. And because it’s true, it has to be said. The decision not to have

babies has condemned some of our people to a very sad ending to their life. The pity is that it won’t happen to those who caused it. It will happen to their

children and grandchildren. They will be ones that have to pay the price for “a woman’s right to choose”.  .

This is not a political blog. It is not a religious blog. It is not a sexist blog. And it is NOT a racist blog.

This is a demographic blog – a blog about worldwide population statistics as complied by the UN and the US Census Bureau. The unhappy truth is, there are

consequences to behavior and this blog is about those consequences.

How important these consequences may be, is up to you to decide. If you don’t think it matters, then fine, it doesn’t matter. But how you feel about it won’t

really matter anyway because what is going to be, is going to be – with your permission or without it.

Caucasian women worldwide now have a birth rate ranging from a catastrophic 1.1 (Spain, Germany and Italy) to a self-destructive 1.5 (America) with a

worldwide average of 1.5, numbers which guarantee the end of their race. These women have chosen extinction for the rest of us. They are altering the very

world we live in. Here are some examples from around the world:

EUROPE: The populations of Canada and Western Europe – largely Caucasian – are in serious decline. So bad is it that, according to the reports of the US

Census Bureau and of Johns Hopkins University, they have already passed the point of no return.

Each of these countries must now find new populations to replace the current Caucasian populations that are disappearing because of a lack of sufficient

replacement babies. In Europe, the answer is now clear: Muslims.

Muslim populations in Western Europe are mushrooming and in 20-30 years, Caucasian will be aminority there just as they are in the United States.

CANADA: Canada’s problem is not as dangerous as Europe’s (Muslim extremism) but much worse than the problem in the United States. Unlike the United States

where the dwindling white race is being quietly replaced by Mexican Christians, Canada has no such available asset. The races and cultures in the world that

are producing excess populations are far removed from Canada’s borders both in miles and ideologies. There is also the matter of climate to consider. Canada

is cold while the Middle East and Africa with burgeoning populations, are both warm. Local populations there might not find the colder climate of Canada

appealing. So where can Canada look to find its new Canadians before their Caucasian population dies out? It’s a good question and I wish I had a good

answer. But I don’t.

Canada’s future – or lack thereof – is sealed. It is destined to return to its former state, that of a pristine wilderness.

UNITED STATES; In the United States things are not as bad. Despite the fact that that the birth rate of Caucasian woman has fallen to 1.5 births per adult

female (25% short of a sustaining rate), as I have pointed out the influx of  Mexican women with a much higher birth rate is making up for the shortfall.

Averaging the lower birthrate of Caucasians with the higher birth rate of these immigrants gives America an overall birth rate of 2.0 which is sufficient to

sustain the population level about where it is. The caveat is that the racial mix of America is undergoing radical change and in the near future, the dying

Caucasian race will be replaced by Mexican Spanish (Whites) and South American Hispanics (mixed Indian, Spanish, and Black).

Following is an official list of European countries that have surprisingly announced improved birth rates in 2007.  Wait until you see who is kidding whom:

1) France 2) Netherlands 3) Belgium 4) Switzerland 5) Austria 6) Germany 7) Italy and Spain

That was a surprise until we checked into the European countries that have the highest proportion of Muslims in their populations. They are:

1) France 2) Netherlands 3) Belgium 4) Switzerland 5) Austria 6) Germany 7) Italy and Spain

Notice anything? Of course you do.

The two lists are identical.

The increase in population they are so proud of all came from the Muslims that have moved into their countries; their indigenous Caucasian populations are

still dying out.

Has anyone noticed the riots around London and Paris and in The Netherlands recently? Who was rioting? It was reported that “youths” were rioting in France.

Youths? No, it wasn’t “youths”, it was Muslims. How is that possible when in France, only 10% of the population are reported to be Muslim? Easy. The riots

took place around urban areas like Paris and that’s where the Muslims live. In those areas, the Muslims are 30% of the people and they are young and male

compared to the local populations which are much older and have more females. It’s not even close to a fair fight.

The future for France (like much of Europe) is sadly clear: Too few babies = too few adults /=/ takeover. Spain, Germany and Italy and maybe even England

aren’t far behind France. In 2006, they all reported very low Caucasian birth rates averaging around 1.25 per woman. England slightly higher, but others

slightly lower.

November, 2006 New York Times:

“Unlike (other) dips in population growth throughout history, this slide, which began in the ‘60s, was not caused by a natural or economic disaster or war or

a plague. There’s no Black Death to blame, no World War I, no Great Depression. This decline is widespread; it is steady, and the current decline shows no

signs of reversing as earlier ones have.”  End Excerpt.

The United Nations Population Division’s Biannual Compendium on World Population Prospects:

“In an underdeveloped country, the average woman must have 2.2 babies in her lifetime in order to maintain a stable population. In a developed nation it is

2.1

July 16, 2006 – Tokyo, Japan

TOKYO — Japan has embarked on a path no developed nation has ever followed — of sustained and inexorable population decline.

SPAIN: Spain faces massive decline in population

RUSSIA: Russia is facing a demographic crisis so dire that its population could shrink by half within 40 years.

MEXICO: Surprisingly, even Mexico’s population is beginning to decline. Bad habits catch on quickly

____________________________________________

Okay, so what do we do to save ourselves from extinction – because that is exactly what we are talking about – extinction brought about by women who think

working in an office or a store or whatever is more important than having the babies upon which our future depends. Well, I don’t think anything will reverse

today’s reality, but here are some ideas being talked about:

(1) Restore motherhood to the place it once held. Elevate motherhood and pay women for raising children just as we pay for any other service.

(2) Encourage women to have babies in those places where babies are in short supply.

(3) Reward families (financially) that have the babies that society needs to survive. Either that or encourage – and finance – mass migration from countries

with too many babies to countries with too few babies. That would work but it would also change forever the demographics of the host nations from the old

Caucasian base to the new Muslim/African base. The time of this transition might also be the time of huge pain and suffering for those being dispossessed.

Those are some of the ideas being discussed but sadly, there is no one solution to all the problems since one half the world has too many and the other has

too few babies.

Finally, I have heard women argue that this type change is normal. That if the white Caucasians disappear, there will be others to replace them so why would

it matter? It’s just a change and if it happens, so be it.

Well, to some extent, that may be true. But the white Caucasian race has been on this planet for over 5,000 years and it has been responsible for many of the

best things that have happened to humanity. I wouldn’t refer to its demise as just a “change”. Not at all. In some places it’s going to be catastrophic. This

kind of change always is.

I pity the children who must grow up to face this daunting challenge. 

Yet, there is nothing to be done about it now. I therefore write this only to inform those who were so sure they were right that they were devastatingly

wrong. Many continue to be, to this day.

We have wasted our heritage through our selfishness and stupidity. And now, we have to deal with it.

I leave you with this thought:

There are none as blind as those that will not see.

Have a nice day.

JOEY

Articles in Joey’s Talk and Controversy are the express opinions of Joey and not Boomeryearbook. However, while non-members can read articles on

boomeryearbook.com only members can make comments. Joey’s section is called Joey’s Talk and Controversy for a good reason. In Joey’s words, “I hope I’ve

given you food for thought and you will join boomeryearbook and respond”.

www.boomeryearbook.com is a social networking site connecting the Baby Boomer generation. Share your thoughts, rediscover old friends, or expand your mind

with brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join today to discover the many ways we are helping Boomers connect for fun and profit.

For www.boomeryearbook.com

Andrew clinton
http://www.articlesbase.com/women’s-issues-articles/do-women-really-have-the-right-to-choose-not-if-we-want-to-survive-they-dont-692840.html

Congratulations! You have begun your viral marketing campaign by writing and submitting articles that have been spread throughout the world through ezines, blogs, and other online publications as others picked up your articles and posted them on their own pages. Two or three times a week you sat down to write and hardly knew how much time had passed from the moment you began writing until you finished. The time went quickly and you remembered how much you enjoyed writing. The ideas flowed and there seemed to be no end to the number of thoughts you could put in print.

You watched your stats for each article, did a Google search for your own name and articles, and were excited by the results you found. Even your “expert” status gave you a high and made you feel good about this new venture you were on. And each day the adventure continued.

Then suddenly one day you sat down to write and nothing came to your mind or you started writing but your thoughts were disjointed and jumbled. The ticking of the clock was there to remind you that hours had passed and the piece of paper or the computer screen before you was half empty. In an effort to complete the article, panic set in and then there were no words, no ideas, no third point to support the main theme (and everyone knows you have to have at least three points to support your theme, don’t they?).

If writer’s block has stopped your article writing campaign in its tracks, choose one or more of these five ideas to break through the block and get your viral marketing efforts back on track.

Move away from the computer

If you have been sitting at your computer, staring at a blank screen, pulling your hair out to get a new idea to write about, get up and move a little. The mere movement away from your computer to get some blood flowing will help to jumpstart your creative juices. If you haven’t come up with an idea to write about just by staring at the screen, continued staring will not change anything for you, except to give you a headache.

Read today’s headlines or your favorite blog

By reading today’s headlines or your favorite blog, your mind will reconnect with words and ideas again. It might take just one sentence or one article for your mind to come up with a new idea, but if you don’t come up with a new idea after the first headline or the first blog, try, try again. If still nothing comes to your mind, at least you have kept up with the news and seeds have been planted in your brain that might surface hours or days later.

Read through your previous articles

Read through some of your own articles to find an article that was written from a broad angle and pick it apart to come up with more articles on narrower topics.

In a typical article, as you were taught in school, you probably made three points that supported your main point. You can write an article on one of these three points and support it with three more points that can be used in later articles, then these three points can be used in three more articles and so on. See where I’m going? Until you get down to the article that tells about the “molecular structure” of whatever your topic is, you can write articles for days based on solely on one of your previous articles.

Make a list of words

Start with just a list of words associated with your business or area of interest that could become the topic of your article. If your business is about decorating on a budget, list the rooms in your house or the techniques, such as paint, wallpaper, stenciling, etc., that can be used to spruce up your walls. Start with just words then move up to phrases as those come to mind.

From this list you can choose one of the words or topics and write an article about that, or you can choose one area, such as walls, and write a series of articles on the different ways to change the look of a room just by changing the walls.

Write a post for your blog

When you have an idea to work with, write a post for your blog. Most blogs are written in a less formal, conversational tone than that used for articles for publication; often you feel as though you are writing to a friend rather than to an audience. Choose a topic or word from the headlines, a previous article, or your list of words and phrases start and writing a short post to your blog.

After writing this less formal, probably smaller, article for your blog, use the main ideas therein to turn it into an article for submission. You can then direct your blog readers to the full article and ask them to rate the article, which will in turn boost your author status, which will likely boost your morale and thus your creativity.

As in Newton’s 1st Law of Motion: a body at rest tends to stay at rest and a body in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. If the ideas you need to get your writing campaign back on track have come to a sudden stop, use one of these outside forces to get in motion again: move away from the computer, read today’s headlines or your favorite blog, read through your previous articles, make a list of words and phrases, or write a post for your blog. You will find the words flowing from your fingertips in no time.

Claudia Pate
http://www.articlesbase.com/viral-marketing-articles/writers-block-5-breakthrough-ideas-100838.html