Archive for the ‘lawyers blog’ Category
SEO Company - Internet Marketing - Search Engine Optimization
What do you think of my voice?
Am I good enough to be a lawyer….speaking wise at least. What about my pace, tone, and pitch. Does it seem confident, strong, etc.?
Have a listen…. http://web.mac.com/steveklinck/Site/Blog/Entries/2008/5/18_My_Song..html
sorry….I’m not going to "install" anything. I’m sure your voice is fine.
San Diego Injury Lawyers
http://www.san-diego-injury-lawyers-blog.info Call the San Diego injury lawyers Mazzei and Sidiropolous in you have suffered an injury or been in an accident and need free legal advice (888) 222-7115
Duration : 0:2:37
To all the people viewing & who are from the debating background, (e.g. Lawyers, Rationalists) pls volunteer!?
To all the people who are from debating background like lawyers, judges or rationalists, I need ur little assistance. If you can just take out ten minutes then can you decide a debate between me & guy who claims to be a rationalist? I mean that can you be the judge of this debate since
a.) you belong to a group of lawyers or judges which is related to debating &
b.) I think that someone third should decide this debate as none of amongst us would agree that they have lost.
You will come to know about the details of the debate after going to that blog or site which is http://indianrationalistschallenge.blogspot.com/ .
There are two posts and in one post he replied me back to my mail which I sent to him in facebook and he posted it in his blog and second was my counter-reply to his reply to my mail and that which he posted it in the blog.
I know that both the posts are very long and especially the second one but I assure you that it won’t take more than ten minutes to read both as you are from legal group. After all, there are longer answers to be given for your law exams but you still give them and court proceedings and judgments are much longer than this but perhaps you still read all of them. Don’t you? Pls decide the debate as:
1.)Who amongst us has won the debate and for what reasons.
2.)Is this guy truly a rationalist as he claims?
3.)Any other detail which you like to give e.g. about his or my nature?
If you have chosen to decide the debate then pls:
a.) Post your comments in the blog and if you do not have an a/c there then pls do open an a/c as it is a simple process.
b.) You can post your comments here also but if you post it on that site then I will be very grateful as I prefer that only.
If you all do not want then I would delete this question after I get the answer so pls REPLY BACK FOR SURE IF YOU WANT TO ASAP!
However, it is upto you to reply or not reply or block my profile and completely ignore this question. If you do not reply or block me or completely ignore this question then I must say bye to you and all the best for your future.
Thanks, but it will be good if you reply and decide that who has won the debate.
seems complicated… i’ll judge your debate, but only if we foolw the same set of rules…
I took photos on the street. Can I post them on my blog if people are visible & recognizable in the pics?
And if so, may I make comments – both good & bad – about the people in the pics? Don’t tell me that you don’t know and that I should ask a lawyer just to get "Answer" points. I want to know if someone really knows the answer. Thank you in advance.
You can certainly post the pictures on your blog. It is your "right" as the copyright owner of the shots to publish them.
However, be very careful with the captions. If you put any captions which could be classed as libelous or defamatory then you can get done by the individuals for that.
Webmaster Tom Foster Explains How Often You Should Blog
http://lawyersvideostudio.com
If you dont know Tom Foster, CEO at Fosterwebmarketing.com, you should. Tom is the mastermind behind my website, oginski-law.com and over 200 lawyers websites across the country.
I had a chance to interview Tom recently at his Fairfax, Virginia office and I asked him how often an attorney should be blogging.
Tom is an expert at creating and promoting lawyer websites and truly gets it. He knows what works, and importantly, what doesnt. You can find him at Fosterwebmarketing.com or call him at 888-886-0939. Oh yes, I almost forgot to mention that Tom and I have written a book together called Creating Video For Lawyers, which, if he finishes his part of the book soon, well be able to get into print. Hurry up Tom, were all waiting!
If you’re an attorney and want to get onto video, I urge you to explore the articles in the Lawyers’ Video Studio at http://lawyersvideostudio.com or contact Gerry by email at Gerry@lawyersvideostudio.com or by phone: 516-487-8207.
Duration : 0:1:24
Medical Malpractice in Plastic Surgery Cases Part 2
The Scarlett Law Group are National Trial Lawyers based in San Francisco, California with outstanding results in cases involving automobile accidents, airplane crashes, traumatic brain injury, head injury, personal injury, catastrophic personal injuries, mass torts, medical malpractice, professional negligence, class actions, civil rights, environmental disasters and wrongful death.
Duration : 0:5:38
John Musca Law – Attorney Profile
http://www.johnmuscalaw.com/
http://www.muscalaw.com/Attorney_Profiles/John_Musca.aspx
http://www.siteoffers.com/john-musca-law-attorney-profile-musca-law/
http://www.asistemsac.com/?p=6
John Musca of Musca Law has a new blog that has been established to supply information about Musca law and the services they offer. Visit the latest blog today for additional information on John Musca and his legal team at Musca Law. www.JohnMuscaLaw.com
About John Musca:
John Musca has committed his legal career to criminal defense. He decided to open his own wide-ranging criminal defense firm in 2001 after serving as a Public Defender in the 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida. His practice has grown tremendously, now operating nine offices throughout the state with plans to ultimately offer full-service criminal defense to all of Florida. Mr. Musca is committed to offering outstanding service to his clients and attributes the achievements of his law practice to the satisfaction of his clients and the attentiveness of the Florida criminal defense lawyers in the office. He describes his work as a criminal defense attorney as his passion, rather than just his job.
During John Muscas career as a private criminal defense attorney and former Public Defender, Mr. John Musca (Attorney) has handled thousands of criminal cases from commencement to end and tried over 100 cases. John Musca believes in an aggressive defense philosophy, focusing on clients strengths and the weaknesses in the prosecutions case. He is licensed to practice law in the state of Florida and the United States Federal Court, Middle District of Florida.
Duration : 0:1:44
Online Video Marketing 101 Blog
http://www.websites-marketing.net – Online Video Marketing is a great way to promote your company and drive traffic to your website. Many industries such as service related local businesses, contractors, lawyers, attorneys, and medical professionals can benefit from Online Video Marketing both on their website and through video distribution sites such as YouTube. SEO Technologies specializes in Video Production and Video Optimization services as well as Search Engine Marketing throughout the U.S.
Duration : 0:3:18
Scottish Paedophile Ring Involving Cops, Lawyers, Covered Up !! Lord Advocate Implicated. P5of5
REGULAR UPDATES FROM HOLLIE’S BLOG HERE : http://stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/
UPDATE ON ROBERT GREEN ARREST HERE : http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1604682/
Earlier report on Hollie Greig’s abuse case here : http://www.ukcolumn.org/2010/02/02/child-rapists-protecte…
In the October 2009 print edition of the UK Column, we reported in our article BBC Hides Truth of Girls Sexual Abuse Ordeal the shocking ordeal of Downs Syndrome girl, Hollie Greig, who was horribly abused by an Aberdeen paedophile ring, over a period of ten years. After investigating and planning a documentary, the BBC abruptly dropped the case, despite admitting that Hollie was a reliable and accurate witness. It is important to stress that both the police and qualified medical experts have described Hollie as a competent and entirely honest witness.
From the age of just six, Hollie was repeatedly sexually abused by her father, Denis Charles Mackie. Later, Mackie began sharing his daughter with a gang of paedophile swingers that has been operating in Aberdeen for many years. The identities of a further seven child victims are already known. There is no question that the gang are well-connected, efficiently organised and totally ruthless. Our frightening story is that they are protected by individuals of high standing within the Scottish establishment.
In 2000, after 14 years of terrified silence, Hollie eventually told her mother, Anne, about the abuses. Formal statements were made to Grampian Police, providing all the horrifying details and the names of the abusers. They included a senior Scottish Sheriff, a policeman, social workers, a nurse, a solicitor, an accountant, a fire officer, married couples and others. Some of the rapes were carried out at the homes of these individuals, including that of the Sheriffs sister. Other children were sometimes involved, including children of the paedophiles themselves.
The latest chapters in this astonishing and horrifying story about Hollie, and the seven other abused children, have taken place over the past few weeks. The key issues are a continued refusal by Grampian police to fully investigate the overwhelming evidence for the paedophile rapes, and a wall of silence by the Scottish establishment.
Whilst there has been some general Scottish media coverage, notably in The Firm and the Aberdeen Press and Journal, the media has been largely silent on what must be one of Scotlands worst top level paedophile scandles. A key figure in the press silence is the Lord Advocate, in her former role as Procurator Fiscal in Aberdeen, when in 2000 she is alleged to have effectively buried the case. Was this to prevent her associate and most influential member of the paedophile ring, Sheriff X, from being investigated, along with the other named members of the fifteen-strong rape gang?
Elish Angiolini, the Scottish Lord Advocate, is in charge of all criminal prosecutions. She is alleged to have reacted immediately to public calls for a full police investigation, by pressurising against publication. Subsequently, and under considerable duress, The Firm published an apology. Shortly afterwards the Press and Journal ran a story accurately describing the case, mentioning a sheriff and police officer without identifying them. Angiolini was not discussed in the article.
Mrs Angiolini`s role in the case recently aroused further suspicion, when it was claimed that she had used a private law firm, Levy and McRae, to issue warnings against all major Scottish editors, threatening them with legal action if any mention was made of her involvement in the case. Suspicious and angry, many individuals directly working to obtain justice for Hollie, as well as a growing number of the general public, now consider that key establishment figures, many with direct responsibility for criminal investigations and justice, have made a concerted and continuous effort to conceal the facts from the people of Scotland. Despite the pressure, investigators and campaigners for Hollie continue to stress that they hold documentary proof of the Lord Advocates actions, as well as proof that she has repeatedly failed to tell the whole truth about her connections with the Hollie abuse case for whatever reason.
The senior partner in the Law Firm, Peter Watson, who is also head of litigation, is understood to have refused to comment as to whether the firms fees have been billed to Mrs Angiolini personally, or if they are being paid by the Scottish taxpayer.
Mrs Angiolinis office decided in December 2009 that they would not pursue the case due to insufficient evidence. Corroborating evidence by private investigators and researchers indicates that other than Hollie, not one of the twenty-four named abusers and victims has even been questioned by Grampian Police
Duration : 0:7:39
someone posted a really offensive comment on my blog (US). IP belongs to a UK ISP. what’re my options legally?
The comment is really offensive. Normally I have a thick skin, but this person misusing the anonymity of the internet bad mouths my two year old daughter, my parents. The IP belongs to a UK ISP, I’m in the US. So can I under UK law (am ready to hire a UK based lawyer), serve a legal notice to the ISP to disclose further details. If the music companies can do it, why can’t an individual?
I usually ignore / delete the comments or let them be posted for irony. But this one kind of has me worked up, especially because of the content. Consider this… I have a two year old daughter and this particular poster makes a lewd reference in his/her post in that.
The point I mentioned music companies is that the RIAA has the ISP’s (At least in US) contact users who run P2P clients and share Copyrighted content on their behalf. So I was thinking if an Individual has the same/similar rights?
I’ll pursue this to see where the law stands on this.
You could pursue legal action if they’ve libelled you or threatened you. However it will be a really expensive process and if you do manage to get them in court and punished he or she would likely only get a slap on the wrists. Probs best just to leave it.
Site operated by Internet Marketing Firm Buildtelligence Web Solutions. Specializing in Attorney websites, and attorney marketing.